Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative analysis of microbial community structure in different times of Panax ginseng Rhizosphere microbiome and soil properties under larch forest

BMC Genomic Data volume 24, Article number: 51 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Panax ginseng cultivated under the forest is popular because its shape and effective ingredients are similar to wild ginseng. The growth of P. ginseng in the larch forest is generally better than in the broad-leaved forest, and the incidence rate of diseases is low. Therefore, the selection of forest species is one of the basic factors in the successful cropping of P. ginseng.

Methods

Illumina HiSeq high-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the 16S rRNA/ITS gene sequence of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil under larch forest to study the rhizosphere microbiome's diversity and community composition structure.

Results

The species classification and richness of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities in the same-aged P. ginseng were similar. Consistent with the soil system of commonly cultivated crops, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Verrucomicrobiota, Chloroflexi, and Basidiomycota, Ascomycota were the dominant phylum of bacteria and fungi, respectively. Compared with the soil without planting P. ginseng, the diversity of microorganisms and community structure of continuous planting for 2 years, 5 years, and 18 years of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil had little change. The accumulation levels of Ilyonectria, Fusarium, Gibberella, and Cylindrocarpon were not significantly increased with planting P. ginseng and the increased age of cropping P. ginseng.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the soil function of the larch forest was good, which provided a theoretical basis for the land selection and soil improvement of cultivating P. ginseng under the larch forest.

Peer Review reports

Background

Ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Mey.), which belongs to the Araliaceae family Panax genus, is a traditional precious Chinese herbal medicine with important economic value [1]. The cultivation mode can be divided into the cultivation of P. ginseng under the forest, the cultivation of P. ginseng in deforestation, and the cultivation of P. ginseng in the farmland [2]. Among them, the cultivation of P. ginseng in the forest is a bionic cultivation mode. The shape and the effective ingredients of P. ginseng planted in the forest are similar to wild ginseng, and the quality is superior comparatively [3]. In order to achieve medicinal characteristics with an efficacy comparable to that of wild ginseng, P. ginseng that has been planted in forests must grow continually in fixed plots for 15 to 20 years, or even longer [4]. P. ginseng soil-borne diseases become more serious with the cultivation years, reducing the P. ginseng survival rate [5].

Microbiota is a major component of agroecosystems [6]. As the most active component in the soil ecosystem, soil microorganisms can improve physical and chemical properties and regulate soil nutrition through their activities [7, 8]. Soil microbiotas directly participate in the circulation and metabolism of substances, and indirectly affect the growth and development of plants. Rhizosphere soil is a unique environment directly affected by plant roots and root exudates, and plays a key role in the interaction between plants and soil microorganisms [9]. Rhizospheric bacteria also act as a barrier against diseases and harmful substances found in soil [10]. As a result, the rhizospheric soil microbial community is an essential biological indicator of soil functioning [11, 12]. It is common for the structure and relative activity of rhizospheric microbiotas to vary from one plant species to another, as well as during stages of plant development and cultivation years [13, 14]. Recent research on the association between continuous cropping and microbial community showed that the diversity and composition of soil microbial community have alternated after continuously planted American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) or P. ginseng (Panax ginseng) [15, 16]. In addition, different cropping years of P. ginseng will also alter the soil microbial community [17, 18].

The leaf litter of trees affects the forest soil nutrients, microbial community diversity, and composition structure. Alterations in the microbial populations of the soil might have an effect on diseases that are transmitted through the soil [19, 20]. Therefore, the selection of forest tree species is one of the keys to the success of cropping P. ginseng under the forest. The early investigation results showed that the occurrence probability of P. ginseng soil-borne disease in larch forests was generally lower than that in broad-leaved forests, and the survival rate of seedlings was higher [21, 22]. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically study and analyze whether the microbial diversity and community composition of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil under larch forests alter with P. ginseng cultivation and growth ages.

Owing to the next-generation sequencing technology allowing the capture of microbes without culturing the microorganisms, as well as the microbial community of difficult to cultivate or even unable to cultivate, microbial profiles analysis has become the main tool in plant science and agriculture [23, 24]. Therefore, this paper uses Illumina HiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology to analyze the 16S rRNA/ITS gene sequence of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil under larch forest, and study the diversity and community composition structure of rhizosphere microorganisms. At the same time, the accumulation level of soil-borne pathogens in the rhizosphere soil of P. ginseng after planting and different years was compared and analyzed, providing theoretical support for the selection of P. ginseng cropping sites and soil improvement under the forest.

Materials and methods

Collection of soil samples

P. ginseng rhizosphere soil samples and control soil samples (without cropping P. ginseng) were collected in July 2020 from the P. ginseng planting base (Beigou Village, Jindou Korean Manchu Autonomous Township, Tonghua County, Jilin Province) under larch forests that have been continuously planted for 2 (Y2), 5 (Y5) and 18 (Y18) years, respectively; following other researchers [25], as well as our previous study [18]. The soil samples without cropping P. ginseng were collected as controls, which were YCK2, YCK5, and YCK18, respectively. The cultivation mode of P. ginseng in the three sampling points is cultivated under forest. P. ginseng seeds are scattered in the forest, and there is no manual intervention during the growth of P. ginseng. During sample collection, the rainy weather was avoided and kept the soil natural dry. Removed the surface soil, dogged out P. ginseng roots, gently scraped the soil near the root surface (at least 5 g) with a cotton swab, transferred it into a marked sterilized bag, and stored it in an ice box for transportation to the laboratory. In this study, three samples were collected for each planting year for sequencing and subsequent analysis.

DNA extraction, gene amplification, and high-throughput sequencing

We have used E.Z.N.A® Soil DNA Kit (OMEGA, U.S.) to extract the total DNA of microorganisms from the soil sample collected from the P. ginseng rhizosphere. NanoDrop 2000 ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, U.S.) was used to detect the concentration and purification of the extracted DNA, and then 1% agarose gel electrophoresis was used for quality detection.

Using the V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene as the target sequence, bacterial genome were amplified with a set of universal primers, for the positive strand as 338F(5'-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3') and the negative strand as 806R(5'-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3') by following other researchers [26], and the amplified product was 468 bp. The Internally Transcribed Space (ITS) region as the fungal target sequence, was amplified with the universal primer set ITS1F (5'-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGAGGAAGTAA-3') / ITS2R (5'-GCTGCGTT CTTCATCGATGC-3) [27], and the amplified product was 300 bp. We have used ABI GeneAmp® 9700 thermocycler for DNA fragment amplification. We denatured DNA at 95 °C for 3 min with a single cycle; followed by denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealed at 55 °C for 30 s with a total of 28 cycles, and extended at 72 °C for 45 s; and then allowed a final extension to the overall reaction at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR reaction recipe is given in Table 1.

Table 1 The PCR reaction recipe for DNA fragment amplification
Full size table

The amplified PCR product was screened using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The gel was purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, U.S.). The gel-purified DNA was quantified using QuantiFluor™-ST (Promega, U.S.).

Following the standard procedure of Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China https://www.majorbio.com/), the purified amplicons were equimolar merged, and paired-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform (TruSeq™ DNA SamplePrep Kit, Illumina, U.S.). For bacterial community analysis, the clustering method used the USEARCH7-uparse algorithm; the OTU sequence similarity was 0.97, the species taxonomy database was silva138/16 s_bacteria, and the classification confidence was 0.7, has been used by other researchers also [28]. Similarly, for the Fungal community analysis, the clustering method used the USEARCH7-uparse algorithm; OTU sequence similarity: 0.97; Confidence: 0.7; species classification database used was ITS;unite8.0/its_fungi [29, 30]. The raw reads are submitted to NCBI's Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database; the accession numbers are PRJNA927237 and PRJNA928213.

Sequence data analysis

The FastQ raw sequencing files were demultiplexed, the quality filter was applied using Trimmomatic [31]. The files were combined with FLASH [32]. We followed these standards: (i) reads were truncated at any point that received an average quality score of < 20 over a sliding 50-bp window, (ii)The primers were aligned exactly, permitted two nucleotide mismatches, and ambiguous reads were filtered out, and (iii) sequences with more than ten bp overlap were merged according to their overlap sequence. We used UCHIME (V4.2) [33], to identify and remove chimeric sequences, and used UPARSE (V7.1) [34] to cluster OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) sequences with a similarity threshold of 97%. Using the RDP Classifier [35]. The taxonomy of each 16S rRNA and ITS sequences were analyzed according to our previous research [18]. After OTU identification results, calculated α-diversity index from Mothur (V1.30.2). The Bray–Curtis distance algorithm was used to calculate the variance and β diversity. PCoA (Principal Co-ordinates Analysis) was investigated using ANOSIM; PERMANOVA was performed using the Bray–Curtis spacing algorithm with 999 permutations [36].

Statistical analysis

This study used Student's t-test to compare alpha diversity indicators of different groups, and the statistical significance was set as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. One-way ANOVA was used for the comparative study of multiple groups.

Results

Sequencing and depth analysis

In order to characterize the microbial community in the rhizosphere soil of P. ginseng under larch forests with different planting years, Illumina MiSeq sequenced eighteen samples. After filtering the sequencing data of eighteen P. ginseng rhizosphere soil samples, a total of 1,429,596 reads of bacterial 16S rRNA V3-V4 effective sequences, and 1,094,396 reads of fungal ITS effective sequences were obtained. The average length of bacterial and fungal sequences was 416 bp and 251 bp, respectively. Seven thousand ninety-four bacterial OTUs and 3486 fungal OTUs were obtained by clustering with 97% sequence similarity of high-quality sequences.

Flattened the data set according to the minimum number of sequences of the samples, and constructed a rarefaction curve in this study. Based on sample OTU counts, rarefaction curves were created (Fig. 1A, B). It can be seen from the figure that the OTUs rarefaction curve of each sample tends to be flat, which indicates that the sequencing data is reasonable for estimating the diversity of bacteria and fungi of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil samples. Compared with bacterial rarefaction curves, fungal have a higher degree of variation in the shape of rarefaction curves.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Rarefaction curves and Venn diagram of individual soil samples (A, C. bacteria, B, D. fungi). Details are provided in the text

Full size image

From the Venn chart of OTU number (Fig. 1C, D), the proportion of unique OTU of P. ginseng rhizosphere bacteria in Y2, Y5, and Y18 was 21.69%, 35.69%, and 20.36%. The proportion of common OTU with non-planted P. ginseng soil bacteria was 56.16%, 49.55%, and 58.40%, respectively. It indicates the total OTU was significantly higher than the unique OTU. The proportion of unique OTU of P. ginseng rhizosphere fungi in Y2 and Y5 was 34.70% and 51.82%, while the proportion of common OTU with non-cultivated P. ginseng soil fungi was 33.55% and 27.33%, respectively. The unique OTU of Y2 and Y5 P. ginseng rhizosphere fungi was higher than the common OTU, while in Y18, the unique OTU of P. ginseng rhizosphere fungi (34.45%) was lower than the common OTU (41.46%).

α- diversity analysis of microbial communities

In order to estimate the differences of the microbial α-diversity, we removed the minimum number sequence from the data set of samples. The Chao richness index and the Shannon evenness index of OUT, were used to reflect the α diversity of microbial communities (Fig. 2). Compared with the soil samples without planting P. ginseng, the rhizosphere bacteria richness index Chao and fungi diversity index Shannon of rhizosphere soil planted P. ginseng for two years decreased significantly, while the bacteria diversity index Shannon and fungi richness index Chao had no significant difference. Compared with the control soil samples, the bacteria richness and diversity of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil planted for five years were significantly improved, and the fungi richness also increased, but the diversity of fungi did not change significantly. The richness and diversity of P. ginseng rhizosphere microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) after planting 18 years of P. ginseng have no significant difference compared with the control soil samples (Fig. 2). P. ginseng is a perennial plant that requires several years of consistent growth in the same site. We noticed that as the number of P. ginseng cropping years increased, there was a significant shift in the -diversity of the soil 'microbe's population. The above analysis results showed that after two years of continuous planting of P. ginseng, the rhizosphere soil microorganisms decreased, while after five years of continuous planting of P. ginseng, the rhizosphere soil microorganisms increased. The rhizosphere microbial community of long-term continuous cultivation of P. ginseng for 18 years had no significant alteration compared with the soil without planting P. ginseng.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Estimation of the microbial community by α-diversity. A. α-diversity of bacterial communities. B. α-diversity of fungal communities. Estimation of α-diversity representing three biological replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)

Full size image

β- diversity analysis of microbial communities

We have estimated the β- diversity according to the phylogenetic level of OTUs of soil microbial communities. We used a Bray–Curtis distance matrix to assess the community composition across samples by estimating the abundance of reads after normalization and square root conversion. Hierarchical clustering was constructed based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. The hierarchically clustered pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil microbe OTUs revealed that the bacterial and fungal communities are fairly closely related, especially the bacteria of the same group samples are completely clustered (Fig. 3A, C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparative analysis at the OTU level using the hierarchical clustering tree of samples (A, bacteria; C, fungi) and PCoA (B, bacteria); D, fungi. The length of the branches in the tree diagram shows the distance between samples. The two samples are most likely to have a similar species composition when they are close to one another on the PCoA plot

Full size image

In order to evaluate the general similarity of microbial community structures in samples, a PCoA analysis was performed; in conjunction with a PERMANOVA analysis, the PCoA results indicated that the community composition of bacteria (R2 = 0.9169, p = 0.001) and fungi (R2 = 0.5292, p = 0.002) differed significantly among the sample groups. PCoA analysis showed that the horizontal co-ordinate was the main co-ordinate component that caused the difference in microbial community composition in different soil samples. It is important to note that, concerning the OTUs, the variance contribution rates of PC1 were 51.20% and 34.39%, respectively, to the difference in the composition of the bacterial and fungal communities in the two samples (Fig. 3B, D).

ANOSIM (|R|) was performed using a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix with 999 permutations to show whether the groups' microbial community structures were significantly different. The "ANOSIM" analysis charts are provided below for bacterial and fungal communities in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The ANOSIM analysis of similarities for i). Bacterial communities ii). Fungal communities

Full size image

Composition and structure of the bacterial community

The rhizosphere bacteria of P. ginseng under larch forest identified 38 phyla, 118 classes, 283 orders, 445 families, 798 genera, 1803 species, and 7094 OTU based on 97% species similarity. The phyla Proteobacteria (25.94%), Actinobacteriota (23.91%), Acidobacteriota (17.12%), Verrucomicrobiota (9.24%), and Chloroflexi (7.91%) were the richest in all the eighteen P. ginseng rhizosphere soil samples (Fig. 5A). We investigated the leading bacterial phyla and perceived distinct bacterial communities in the soil samples cropping P. ginseng. The soil microbial community structure differed in diverse years of continuous planting of P. ginseng (Fig. 5B). The first ten phyla were rated using ANOVA to test the impact of different cultivation years (YCK2 vs. Y2, YCK5 vs. Y5, YCK18 vs. Y18) on their relative abundance in percent values (Fig. 5C). Verrucomicrobiota, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Methylomirabilota, and Myxococcota in the top ten relatively abundant bacterial phyla were significantly different among distinct samples. The significant difference between the bacterial communities of planted and non-planted P. ginseng soil was further assessed by 'Student's t-test (Fig. 5C). Compared with no planted P. ginseng soil samples, the relative abundance of dominant bacteria Chloroflexi (YCK2 8.711%, Y2 6.495%), Methylomirabilota (YCK2 3.367%, Y2 1.934%), and Firmicutes (YCK2 3.130%, Y2 1.916%) were significantly decreased in the rhizosphere soil continuous planting P. P. ginseng for two years (p < 0.05). However, Firmicutes (YCK5 1.698%, Y5 2.583%), and Myxococcota (YCK5 1.675%, Y5 2.283%) were significantly increased in continuous cultivated P. ginseng soil for five years. After 18 years of P. ginseng continuous cultivation in larch forest, the relative abundance of Firmicutes (YCK18 3.430%, Y18 2.025%), and Methylomirabilota (YCK18 2.342%, Y18 1.435%) decreased significantly in Y18 as compared to that in YCK18 (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The composition and organization of the bacterial colony. A. Pieplot for phylum-level investigation of bacterial communities. B. The relative abundances of the various bacterial phyla. C. A phylum-level assessment of the presence of bacteria in soil samples taken from planted and unplanted P. ginseng. For every rhizospheric soil sample taken, there were triple biological duplicates. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)

Full size image

Composition and structure of the fungal community

From fungal ITS sequences of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil, 15 phyla, 63 classes, 156 orders, 339 families, 709 genera, 1158 species, and 3486 OTU were identified. Fungal OTUs predominantly comprised of phyla Basidiomycota (49.37%), Ascomycota (28.68%), Mortierellomycota (13.50%), Rozellomycota (2.83%), Mucoromycota (0.81%), Chytridiomycota (0.11%) and Glomeromycota (0.11%) (Fig. 6A). Basidiomycota showed the highest abundance in the soil samples of larch forest while cultivating P. ginseng (Fig. 6A). By comparing the fungal communities in non-planting P. ginseng soil and three distinct years of P. ginseng cultivation, we could determine the dominating fungal phyla (Fig. 6B). The relative abundance of Basidiomycota and Rozellomycota varied significantly (p < 0.05) on different soil samples among nearly all identified fungal phyla. To determine whether there was a significant difference between the fungal communities in the non-cropping P. ginseng soils, the Student's t-test was conducted. (YCK2, YCK5, YCK18) and continuous planting of P. ginseng soil samples (Y2, Y5, Y18). In the second year of P. ginseng cultivation, there was an increase in the relative abundances of Basidiomycota in Y2 (57.720%) compared to those in the YCK2 soil sample, which was 16.210% for the phyla. While the relative abundance of Mortierellomycota (YCK2 30.780%, Y2 8.264%), and Rozellomycota (YCK2 9.011%, Y2 2.403%) decreased remarkably in Y2 compared to that in YCK2 (Fig. 6C). After continuous planting of P. ginseng for five or eighteen years in the larch forest field, the relative abundances of fungal phyla did not vary significantly in Y5 and Y18 as compared to that in YCK5 and YCK18, respectively (Fig. 6C).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Fungal community composition and structure. A. A phylum-level pie chart for analyzing fungal communities. B. The diversity of fungal phyla across collections and their relative abundances. C. Comparison of fungal abundance in the planted and non-planted P. ginseng soil samples at the phylum level. Three replicates were used for each rhizospheric soil sample (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)

Full size image

The multi-group comparative analysis

The multi-group comparative analysis on 3 samples Y2, Y5 and Y18 has been conducted for bacterial and fungal communities. The results are shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The multi-group comparative analysis; i). Bacterial communities ii). Fungal communities

Full size image

Accumulation of pathogenic fungi with cropping P. ginseng

P. ginseng is a perennial plant, which needs to be planted continuously for many years. With the increase in the number of P. ginseng cropping years, the accumulation level of pathogenic fungi in the soil rises, and the soil-borne disease of P. ginseng becomes progressively serious [18]. An early investigation found that the incidence of P. ginseng diseases under the larch forest was low, and the disease index was small. Therefore, it is speculated that with the P. ginseng cropping and increase of planting years, the accumulation level of P. ginseng related pathogenic fungi in the soil under larch forest is insignificant. Fusarium is a common pathogenic fungi that causes soil-borne diseases in plants, including P. ginseng [37]. Gibberella, the perfect stage of Fusarium, was also detected in the eighteen soil samples [38]. In addition to P. ginseng root rot, another major soil-borne disease is P. ginseng rust rot, which is caused by Cylindrocarpon and/or Ilyonectria [39]. Accordingly, we analyzed the changes in the abundances of these four pathogenic species with cropping P. ginseng under a larch forest. We found that four pathogenic species (Fusarium, Gibberella, Cylindrocarpon, and Ilyonectria) accumulated differently in P. ginseng rhizosphere soil samples of different plantation years (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

The relative abundance of different pathogenic fungi in soil samples. Three replicates were used for each sample (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)

Full size image

The results of this study showed that the total number of four kinds of pathogenic fungi in the rhizosphere soil of P. ginseng planted for two years (Y2) was significantly reduced compared with that in the larch forest soil without cropping P. ginseng (YCK2). The content of Ilyonectria (YCK2 1.43%, Y2 0.25%, p < 0.05) and Fusarium (YCK2 0.17%, Y2 0.03%, p < 0.01) in Y2 decreased significantly compared with that of YCK2, as shown in Fig. 9A&B. Compared with the larch forest soil samples (YCK5), the sum of four kinds of pathogens in the rhizosphere soil of P. ginseng cultivated for five years (Y5) showed an increasing trend. Although the total number of pathogenic fungi in Y5 increased significantly, four pathogenic species' accumulation level did not vary significantly compared with YCK5. However, the total amount of four pathogens in the rhizosphere soil of P. ginseng planted continuously for 18 years (Y18) is nearly the same as that in the larch forest soil without planting P. ginseng (YCK18). And the accumulation level of these four pathogenic fungi in Y18 did not increase significantly with continuously planted P. ginseng for 18 years. In short, the abundance of these four types of P. ginseng pathogens was less. And the accumulation level of pathogens (Fusarium, Gibberella, Cylindrocarpon, and Ilyonectria) did not increase significantly compared with the control samples with the P. ginseng cropping under larch forest and the increase of cultivation years.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The comparative results of four pathogens among three samples, Y2, Y5, and Y18, reveal the changes with the extension of planting time. A. Percent community abundance of the four fungal pathogens B. Difference in the fungal pathogens distribution with passage of time

Full size image

Discussion

P. ginseng is a perennial, slow-growing plant primarily used in Chinese herbal remedies. During the long-term natural and artificial selection, three cultivation modes have been formed, including cultivated P. ginseng under the forest, cultivated P. ginseng in deforestation, and cultivation of P. ginseng in the farmland. Cultivated P. ginseng under the forest, namely forest P. ginseng, is developed by sowing P. ginseng seeds into the natural environment, allowing them to grow without any artificial interference or management, and its growth usually exceeds ten years [40]. When grown in a forest, P. ginseng is more similar to wild ginseng than when it is grown in a farm [41]. Several factors such as climate change and soil properties affectplant's survival [42]. The soil-borne diseases of P. ginseng are aggravated with the increase in cultivation years, decreasing the persistence rate of P. ginseng. An early investigation found that the growth status and survival rate of P. ginseng in larch forests were generally better than those in broad-leaved forests [43, 44]. Tree species not only affect the shade degree of the forest, but also influence the soil microbial community composition [45]. These microbes play an important role in the completion of nutrients cycles. Therefore, the selection of forest tree species is one of the important factors for the success of cropping P. ginseng under the forest.

Microbial communities can be employed as sensitive biological markers of soil health and function, and they play an important role in sustaining soil ecosystem stability and health [46, 47]. Variations in microbial communities may have adverse effects on soil quality and plant health. Previous research has found that P. ginseng cultivation, particularly on diverse lands and for varying lengths of time, affects the richness and organization of the P. ginseng rhizosphere microbial population [48, 49]. In addition, several other factors can affect root biomass and morphology [50]. This study found that the richness and evenness of soil microbial communities both fungi and bacteria in larch forests, transformed substantially with the different planting years of P. ginseng. Compared with the larch forest soil without cropping P. ginseng, the microbial community of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil changed significantly after planting P. ginseng for two or five years, while the microbial community of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil did not alteration after cultivating P. ginseng for 18 years (Fig. 2). The microbial communities in rhizosphere soil of the same annual P. ginseng under larch forest are relatively close in the hierarchical clustering of pairwise Bray–Curtis dissimilarities, especially since the bacteria in the same group of samples are completely clustered (Fig. 3A, C). PCoA results showed that the community composition of bacteria (R2 = 0.9169, p = 0.001) and fungi (R2 = 0.5292, p = 0.002) in different samples was significantly different (Fig. 3B, D). The results showed that the microbial composition of P. ginseng rhizosphere soil varied significantly with the cultivation years. Other researchers studied microbial communities in different environments [51].

The rhizosphere microbial community may be influenced by the soil's characteristics and crop variety [52, 53]. The key factor for this change is planting years [54]. The plant's developmental stage is a major factor in determining the microbiome composition [55]. Root exudates at various phases of development may be responsible for this phenomenon [56, 57], which is responsible for this change of the rhizosphere microbiome community, during plant growth [52, 58]. The bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Chloroflexi, and the fungal phyla Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Mortierellomycota were the most abundant during P. ginseng cultivation under larch forest in the current study, as we have indicated in Figs. 5A and 6A. Our findings are in accordance with other researchers' reports on farmland P. ginseng [18] and other crops (cotton) [59], soybean [60], and peanut [61]. Habitat specialization is important in species richness [62, 63]. These microbial phyla were abundant in P. ginseng's soil ecosystem. Proteobacteria was most significantly enriched in 18 larch forest soils (Fig. 5A). Proteobacteria, related to eutrophic soil [64, 65], plays an essential role in the global nitrogen, sulfur, iron, and carbon cycles [66, 67]. The second most prevalent group, Actinobacteriota, takes part in the decomposition of soil organic matter and the global carbon cycle [68, 69]. Actinobacteriota abundance fluctuated with the P. ginseng culture years, demonstrating that the P. ginseng cropping had a significant impact on the Actinobacteriota population. As a result, individuals of both Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota may play a part in maintaining microbial homeostasis in soil used for continuous cropping. The soil nutrients have been influenced by several types of microbes [70].

The allelochemicals found in P. ginseng have been shown to cause disruption to the delicate equilibrium of the microbiome [71], reduce beneficial fungi, and increase pathogenic fungi in the rhizosphere soil of P. ginseng [72]. The preliminary investigation found that P. ginseng under larch forest grew well, and the incidence of P. ginseng disease was low. Therefore, it is speculated that with the P. ginseng cropping and increase of cultivation years, the accumulation level of P. ginseng related pathogens in the soil under larch forest is insignificant. P. ginseng root rot caused by Fusarium, and P. ginseng rust rot caused by Cylindrocarpon and Ilyonectria are important soil-borne diseases in P. ginseng cultivation [73, 74]. Furthermore, Gibberella, a perfect stage for Fusarium [38], is also an important soil-borne pathogen. The analysis of pathogenic species found that the accumulation level of Fusarium, Gibberella, Cylindrocarpon, and Ilyonectria in the rhizosphere soil of different age P. ginseng under the larch forest was different (Fig. 8). The research results indicated that the summation of four kinds of pathogenic fungi in Y2 was significantly decreased compared with that in YCK2. The amount of Ilyonectria and Fusarium in Y2 reduced significantly compared with that of YCK2. Compared with YCK5, the total amount of four pathogens in Y5 showed an increasing trend, but the accumulation level of four pathogenic species did not variation significantly. Compared with YCK18, the accumulation level of four pathogenic fungi in Y18 did not increase significantly with continuously cropping P. ginseng for 18 years (Fig. 8).

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the pathogens (Fusarium, Gibberella, Cylindrocarpon, and Ilyonectria) in the soil of the larch forest changed little or not significantly with the P. ginseng planting and the increase of cultivation years. It suggested that the soil function of the larch forest was good. This study provides a theoretical basis for the land selection and soil improvement of cultivating P. ginseng under forest.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset(s) supporting the conclusions of this article are available online at NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (Accession Number: PRJNA927237 and PRJNA928213).

References

  1. Shahrajabian MH, Sun W, Cheng Q. A review of ginseng species in different regions as a multipurpose herb in traditional Chinese medicine, modern herbology and pharmacological science. J Med Plant Res. 2019;13(10):213–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H, Abid S, Ahn JC, Mathiyalagan R, Kim Y-J, Yang D-C, Wang Y. Characteristics of Panax ginseng Cultivars in Korea and China. Molecules. 2020;25:E2635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 张义杰, 张帅, 粟珊, 靳百慧, 全怡吉, 王文鹏, 杨宽, 何霞红: 石林县三七仿生种植对根际土壤微生物多样性的影响. 云南农业大学学报 (自然科学) 2021, 36(3):487–493.

  4. Ma R, Sun L, Chen X, Mei B, Chang G, Wang M, Zhao D. Proteomic analyses provide novel insights into plant growth and ginsenoside biosynthesis in forest cultivated Panax ginseng (F. Ginseng). Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ji L, Nasir F, Tian L, Chang J, Sun Y, Zhang J, Li X, Tian C. Outbreaks of root rot disease in different aged American ginseng plants are associated with field microbial dynamics. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:676880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumaishi K, Usui E, Suzuki K, Kobori S, Sato T, Toda Y, Takanashi H, Shinozaki S, Noda M, Takakura A. High throughput method of 16S rRNA gene sequencing library preparation for plant root microbial community profiling. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou Z, Wang C, Luo Y. Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu L, Zhu K, Wurzburger N, Zhang J. Relationships between plant diversity and soil microbial diversity vary across taxonomic groups and spatial scales. Ecosphere. 2020;11(1):e02999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian T, Reverdy A, She Q, Sun B, Chai Y. The role of rhizodeposits in shaping rhizomicrobiome. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2020;12(2):160–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramakodi MP. Functional metagenomics profiling of symbiotic microbiome. In: Microbial Symbionts. Edited by Dharumadurai D: Academic Press; 2023:691–713.

  11. Eisenhauer N, Bonkowski M, Brose U, Buscot F, Durka W, Ebeling A, Fischer M, Gleixner G, Heintz-Buschart A, Hines J. Biotic interactions, community assembly, and eco-evolutionary dynamics as drivers of long-term biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Res Ideas Outcomes: The Open Science J. 2019;5:e47042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmid MW, van Moorsel SJ, Hahl T, De Luca E, De Deyn GB, Wagg C, Niklaus PA, Schmid B. Effects of plant community history, soil legacy and plant diversity on soil microbial communities. J Ecol. 2021;109(8):3007–23.

  13. Zhang J, Wei L, Yang J, Ahmed W, Wang Y, Fu L, Ji G. Probiotic consortia: Reshaping the rhizospheric microbiome and its role in suppressing root-rot disease of Panax notoginseng. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong L, Xu J, Feng G, Li X, Chen S. Soil bacterial and fungal community dynamics in relation to Panax notoginseng death rate in a continuous cropping system. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dong L, Xu J, Zhang L, Yang J, Liao B, Li X, Chen S. High-throughput sequencing technology reveals that continuous cropping of American ginseng results in changes in the microbial community in arable soil. Chinese Medicine. 2017;12:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y-x YING, W-l DING, Y-q ZHOU. Yong L: Influence of Panax ginseng continuous cropping on metabolic function of soil microbial communities. Chinese Herbal Med. 2012;4(4):329–34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yong L, Yixin Y, Dongyue Z, Wanlong D. Microbial community diversity analysis of Panax ginseng rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA method. Open J Genet. 2012, 2012.

  18. Tong A-Z, Liu W, Liu Q, Xia G-Q, Zhu J-Y. Diversity and composition of the Panax ginseng rhizosphere microbiome in various cultivation modesand ages. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou X, Wu F. Dynamics of the diversity of fungal and Fusarium communities during continuous cropping of cucumber in the greenhouse. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;80(2):469–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X, Wang T, Xu J, Shen Z, Yang Y, Chen A, Wang S, Liang E, Piao S. Enhanced habitat loss of the Himalayan endemic flora driven by warming-forced upslope tree expansion. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022;6(7):890–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farh ME, Kim YJ, Abbai R, Singh P, Jung KH, Kim YJ, Yang DC. Pathogenesis strategies and regulation of ginsenosides by two species of Ilyonectria in Panax ginseng: power of speciation. J Ginseng Res. 2020;44(2):332–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Farrington SJ. An ecological study of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) in the Missouri Ozark highlands: effects of herbivory and harvest, ecological characterization and wild simulated cultivation. Columbia: University of Missouri; 2006.

  23. Knief C. Analysis of plant microbe interactions in the era of next generation sequencing technologies. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nwachukwu BC, Babalola OO. Metagenomics: A Tool for Exploring Key Microbiome With the Potentials for Improving Sustainable Agriculture. Front Sustainable Food Syst. 2022;6:886987.

  25. Zheng H, Heděnec P, Rousk J, Schmidt IK, Peng Y, Vesterdal L. Effects of common European tree species on soil microbial resource limitation, microbial communities and soil carbon. Soil Biol Biochem. 2022;172:108754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu N, Tan G, Wang H, Gai X. Effect of biochar additions to soil on nitrogen leaching, microbial biomass and bacterial community structure. Eur J Soil Biol. 2016;74:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adams RI, Miletto M, Taylor JW, Bruns TD. Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances. ISME J. 2013;7(7):1262–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu L, Zhao Y, Liu S, Zhang J, Yuan H, Xu H. High-fat diet in mice led to increased severity of spermatogenesis impairment by lead exposure: perspective from gut microbiota and the efficacy of probiotics. J Sci Food Agric. 2023;103(5):2653–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei S, Fang J, Zhang T, Wang J, Cheng Y, Ma J, Xie R, Liu Z, Su E, Ren Y, et al. Dynamic changes of soil microorganisms in rotation farmland at the western foot of the Greater Khingan range. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023;11:1191240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Du S, You S, Jiang X, Li Y, Jia Y. Longitudinal Investigation of the Native Grass Hay from Storage to Market Reveals Mycotoxin-Associated Fungi. Microorganisms. 2022;10(6):1154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(21):2957–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16):2194–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods. 2013;10(10):996–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lan Y, Wang Q, Cole JR, Rosen GL. Using the RDP classifier to predict taxonomic novelty and reduce the search space for finding novel organisms. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Somerfield PJ, Clarke KR, Gorley RN. A generalised analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) statistic for designs with ordered factors. Austral Ecol. 2021;46(6):901–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Guan Y, Lu B, Wang Y, Gao J, Wu L. First report of root rot caused by Fusarium redolens on ginseng (Panax ginseng) in Jilin province of China. Plant Dis. 2014;98(6):844–844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vigier B, Reid L, Dwyer L, Stewart D, Sinha R, Arnason J, Butler G. Maize resistance to gibberella ear rot: symptoms, deoxynivalenol, and yield1. Can J Plant Path. 2001;23(1):99–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Farh ME-A, Kim Y-J, Kim Y-J, Yang D-C. Cylindrocarpon destructans/Ilyonectria radicicola-species complex: Causative agent of ginseng root-rot disease and rusty symptoms. J Ginseng Res. 2018;42(1):9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang H-P, Zhang Y-B, Yang X-W, Zhao D-Q, Wang Y-P. Rapid characterization of ginsenosides in the roots and rhizomes of Panax ginseng by UPLC-DAD-QTOF-MS/MS and simultaneous determination of 19 ginsenosides by HPLC-ESI-MS. J Ginseng Res. 2016;40(4):382–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang C-Q, Yi L-W, Zhao L, Zhou Y-Z, Guo F, Huo Y-S, Zhao D-Q, Xu F, Wang X, Cai S-Q. 177 Saponins, Including 11 New Compounds in Wild Ginseng Tentatively Identified via HPLC-IT-TOF-MSn, and Differences among Wild Ginseng, Ginseng under Forest, and Cultivated Ginseng. Molecules. 2021;26(11):3371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang Y, Liu L, Zhang P, Wu F, Wang Y, Xu C, Zhang L, An S, Kuzyakov Y. Large-scale ecosystem carbon stocks and their driving factors across Loess Plateau. Carbon Neutrality. 2023;2(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gao P, Zhu J, Yang K, Yan Q, Zhang J, Yu L, Diao M, Xu S. Can larch-Aralia elata agroforestry systems improve the soil chemical and microbial properties of larch plantations? Agrofor Syst. 2022;96(5–6):885–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Song JM, Yi J-S, Cheong EJ. Growing Three Wild Herbaceous Plants, Allium victorialis var. platyphyllum, Ligularia stenocephala, and Panax ginseng in the Understory of Larix kaempferi Plantation. J Korean Soc Forest Sci. 2019;108(4):522–30.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yu D, Zhou L, Zhou W, Ding H, Wang Q, Wang Y, Wu X, Dai L. Forest Management in Northeast China: History, Problems, and Challenges. Environ Manage. 2011;48(6):1122–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zuppinger-Dingley D, Schmid B, Petermann JS, Yadav V, De Deyn GB, Flynn DF. Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effects. Nature. 2014;515(7525):108–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang G, Zhao Z, Yin X-A, Zhu Y. Impacts of biochars on bacterial community shifts and biodegradation of antibiotics in an agricultural soil during short-term incubation. Sci Total Environ. 2021;771:144751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Xiao C, Yang L, Zhang L, Liu C, Han M. Effects of cultivation ages and modes on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soil of Panax ginseng. J Ginseng Res. 2016;40(1):28–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vendan RT, Lee SH, Yu YJ, Rhee YH. Analysis of bacterial community in the ginseng soil using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Indian J Microbiol. 2012;52:286–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Li W, Shi Y, Zhu D, Wang W, Liu H, Li J, Shi N, Ma L, Fu S. Fine root biomass and morphology in a temperate forest are influenced more by the nitrogen treatment approach than the rate. Ecol Ind. 2021;130:108031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang Y, Dou Y, Wang B, Xue Z, Wang Y, An S, Chang SX. Deciphering factors driving soil microbial life-history strategies in restored grasslands. iMeta. 2023;2(1):e66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Berg G, Smalla K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;68(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Micallef SA, Shiaris MP, Colón-Carmona A. Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(6):1729–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. She S, Niu J, Zhang C, Xiao Y, Chen W, Dai L, Liu X, Yin H. Significant relationship between soil bacterial community structure and incidence of bacterial wilt disease under continuous cropping system. Arch Microbiol. 2017;199:267–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Houlden A, Timms-Wilson TM, Day MJ, Bailey MJ. Influence of plant developmental stage on microbial community structure and activity in the rhizosphere of three field crops. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;65(2):193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Bakker MG, Sugiyama A, Manter DK, Vivanco JM. Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e55731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Dong L, Xu J, Zhang L, Cheng R, Wei G, Su H, Yang J, Qian J, Xu R, Chen S. Rhizospheric microbial communities are driven by Panax ginseng at different growth stages and biocontrol bacteria alleviates replanting mortality. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2018;8(2):272–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Vivanco JM. Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. ISME J. 2014;8(4):790–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Xi H, Shen J, Qu Z, Yang D, Liu S, Nie X, Zhu L. Effects of long-term cotton continuous cropping on soil microbiome. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Li C, Li X, Kong W, Wu Y, Wang J. Effect of monoculture soybean on soil microbial community in the Northeast China. Plant Soil. 2010;330:423–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Li X-g, Ding C-f, Zhang T-l, Wang X-x. Fungal pathogen accumulation at the expense of plant-beneficial fungi as a consequence of consecutive peanut monoculturing. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;72:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yan Y, Jarvie S, Liu Q, Zhang Q. Effects of fragmentation on grassland plant diversity depend on the habitat specialization of species. Biol Cons. 2022;275:109773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Nie S, Mo S, Gao T, Yan B, Shen P, Kashif M, Zhang Z, Li J, Jiang C. Coupling effects of nitrate reduction and sulfur oxidation in a subtropical marine mangrove ecosystem with Spartina alterniflora invasion. Sci Total Environ. 2023;862:160930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Smit E, Leeflang P, Gommans S, van den Broek J, van Mil S, Wernars K. Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(5):2284–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Castro HF, Classen AT, Austin EE, Norby RJ, Schadt CW. Soil microbial community responses to multiple experimental climate change drivers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(4):999–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hedrich S, Schlömann M, Johnson DB. The iron-oxidizing proteobacteria. Microbiology. 2011;157(6):1551–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Rosenzweig N, Tiedje JM, Quensen JF III, Meng Q, Hao JJ. Microbial communities associated with potato common scab-suppressive soil determined by pyrosequencing analyses. Plant Dis. 2012;96(5):718–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Fradin EF, Thomma BP. Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo‐atrum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;7(2):71–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Upchurch R, Chiu C-Y, Everett K, Dyszynski G, Coleman DC, Whitman WB. Differences in the composition and diversity of bacterial communities from agricultural and forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40(6):1294–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Xu R, Wang YN, Sun Y, Wang H, Gao Y, Li S, Guo L, Gao L. External sodium acetate improved Cr(VI) stabilization in a Cr-spiked soil during chemical-microbial reduction processes: Insights into Cr(VI) reduction performance, microbial community and metabolic functions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;251:114566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wu L, Wang J, Huang W, Wu H, Chen J, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Lin W. Plant-microbe rhizosphere interactions mediated by Rehmannia glutinosa root exudates under consecutive monoculture. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):15871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Li Z, Fu J, Zhou R, Wang D. Effects of phenolic acids from ginseng rhizosphere on soil fungi structure, richness and diversity in consecutive monoculturing of ginseng. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25(8):1788–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Li T, Kim J-H, Jung B, Ji S, Seo MW, Han YK, Lee SW, Bae YS, Choi H-G, Lee S-H. Transcriptome analyses of the ginseng root rot pathogens Cylindrocarpon destructans and Fusarium solani to identify radicicol resistance mechanisms. J Ginseng Res. 2020;44(1):161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bischoff Nunes I, Goodwin PH. Interaction of ginseng with Ilyonectria root rot pathogens. Plants. 2022;11(16):2152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Noor Bahadar for revising the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science Technology Development Plan Project of Jilin Province (20190304012YY) and by the Science and Technology Project of the Jilin Education Department (JJKH20210547KJ). The funding body has no role in the designing of the study nor the interpretation of the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Evaluation and Application of Changbai Mountain Biological Germplasm Resources of Jilin Province, College of Life Science, Tonghua Normal University, Tonghua, 134002, China

    Tong Aizi, Liu Lijuan, Liu Lihua, Liu Wei & Qin Jiamei

Authors
  1. Tong Aizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liu Lijuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liu Lihua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liu Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qin Jiamei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TA, L. Ln, L. La, and LW designed the study, collected the samples, executed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. QJ supervised the study, provided technical assistance, and provided financial support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qin Jiamei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the local rules and regulations for using plants for research were followed. There is no need to obtain a license to study plants for research purposes.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The software’s used in this study. 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aizi, T., Lijuan, L., Lihua, L. et al. Comparative analysis of microbial community structure in different times of Panax ginseng Rhizosphere microbiome and soil properties under larch forest. BMC Genom Data 24, 51 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12863-023-01154-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12863-023-01154-1

Keywords

BMC Genomic Data

ISSN: 2730-6844

Contact us