Skip to main content

De novo genome assembly and analysis unveil biosynthetic and metabolic potentials of Pseudomonas fragi A13BB

Abstract

Objectives

The role of rhizosphere microbiome in supporting plant growth under biotic stress is well documented. Rhizobacteria ward off phytopathogens through various mechanisms including antibiosis. We sought to recover novel antibiotic-producing bacterial strains from soil samples collected from the rhizosphere. Pseudomonas fragi A13BB was recovered as part of this effort, and the whole genome was sequenced to facilitate mining for potential antibiotic-encoding biosynthetic gene clusters.

Data description

Here, we report the complete genome sequence of P. fragi A13BB obtained from de novo assembly of Illumina MiSeq and GridION reads. The 4.94 Mb genome consists of a single chromosome with a GC content of 59.40%. Genomic features include 4410 CDSs, 102 RNAs, 3 CRISPR arrays, 3 prophage regions, and 37 predicted genomic islands. Two β-lactone biosynthetic gene clusters were identified; besides, metabolic products of these are known to show antibiotic and/or anticancer properties. A siderophore biosynthetic gene cluster was also identified even though P. fragi is considered a non-siderophore producing pseudomonad. Other gene clusters of broad interest identified include those associated with bioremediation, biocontrol, plant growth promotion, or environmental adaptation. This dataset unveils various un−/underexplored metabolic or biosynthetic potential of P. fragi and provides insight into molecular mechanisms underpinning these attributes.

Objective

The rhizosphere has been described as one of the most complex ecosystems on Earth, harboring abundant dynamic plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are one of the components of this ecosystem where they promote plant growth by enhancing uptake of nutrients and inorganic elements, or by increasing resistance to various environmental stresses including heavy metals, high salt concentrations and phytopathogens [1, 2]. PGPR protect against phytopathogens through a variety of mechanisms, including the ability to gain competitive advantage for nutrients and trace elements and/or produce one or more antibiotics effective against such pathogens [1, 2]. Whilst the latter characteristic (which is common to many soil dwelling bacteria) has been exploited to develop many clinically useful antibiotics, it remains the case that less than 1% of all known bacterial species have had their metabolic capabilities exploited in this way [3]. We therefore sought to recover potential novel antibiotic-producing bacterial strains from soil samples collected from the rhizosphere of various plants. Pseudomonas fragi strain A13BB was isolated as part of this effort.

P. fragi is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, aerobic psychrophile. It is widely distributed in nature and commonly associated with meat and dairy spoilage [4, 5]. It is rarely reported as a PGPR except by Selvakumar et al [5] and Fahr et al [6] who reported its phosphate solubilisation activity and its ability to improve tolerance against aluminium stress in acidic soils, respectively. However, to the best of our knowledge, it has not been previously reported as an antibiotic producer. Therefore, being a species not readily associated with antibiotic production, the genome of P. fragi A13BB was sequenced to facilitate mining for potential antibiotic-encoding secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (smBGCs) and other gene clusters that may be responsible for its environmental adaptation and plant growth promotion.

Data description

P. fragi A13BB was isolated from the rhizosphere of a plant in Aberdeen, Scotland (57.101 N 2.078 W) using an ultra-minimal substrate medium (data file 1) [7]. Purified strain was cultivated in nutrient broth (Oxoid, UK) at 28 °C for 24 h before gDNA was extracted from pellets with the DNeasy® Ultraclean® Microbial Kit for DNA Isolation (Qiagen, UK). The extract was used as template to amplify the 16S rRNA gene in PCR reactions using 27F and U1510R universal primers, with thermocycler parameters set as follows: Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of further denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 45 °C for 30 s and elongation at 72 °C for 105 s. A final elongation was carried out at 70 °C for 5 min. Amplified DNA fragment was sequenced using the 27F primer. Isolate was subsequently identified by 16S rRNA gene comparison as P. fragi with 99% identity score.

Libraries were prepared for Illumina sequencing by Glasgow Polyomics (Glasgow, UK) using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA) following manufacturer’s protocol, and sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq using a 300 bp paired end protocol. Libraries were prepared for GridION sequencing by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK) using the Oxford nanopore SQK-RBK004 kit and/or SQK-LSK109 kit with Native Barcoding EXP-NBD104/114 (ONT, UK), and sequenced on a FLO-MIN106 (R.9.4 or R.9.4.1) flow cell in a GridION (ONT, UK).

Illumina reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic [8] v0.36 operated in the sliding window mode with Q25 quality cut-off and minimum read length of 100. The quality of trimmed reads was assessed with FastQC [9] v0.11.8 and results were aggregated with MultiQC [10] v1.8 (data file 2) [11]. Mean quality score across each base position was ≥31. Quality assessment of GridION reads was performed with NanoPlot [12] v1.28.2. Quality statistics are summarised in data file 3 [13], while average read quality plot is displayed in data file 4 [14].

Paired short reads and long reads were assembled de novo with Unicycler [15] v0.4.8. Assembly quality was assessed with Quast [16] v5.0.2. Two contigs were identified (data file 5) [17], the smaller contig (5386 bp) representing the complete genome of bacteriophage φX174 (control spike in Illumina sequencing) was subsequently extracted from the data. The larger contig (4,940,458 bp) represents the complete genome of P. fragi A13BB with sequencing depths of 226x and 32x for Illumina and GridION sequencing, respectively. Assembly completeness was 99.2% as assessed with BUSCO [18] v4.1.2 using the pseudomanadales_odb10 lineage dataset (data file 6) [19]. Assembly graph was visualised with Bandage [20] and displayed in data file 7 [21]. ANI analysis with the FastANI tool [22] v1.3 confirmed identity as P. fragi with the ANI value of 98.9071. Gene and functional annotations were performed with PGAP [23] v4.13 and RASTtk [24] v2.0. Metabolic pathway analyses were performed using the KEGG database [25] Rel 93.0. CRISPRs were identified by CRISPRCasFinder [26], genomic islands were predicted by IslandViewer 4 [27], prophages were identified by PHASTER [28] and smBGCs were identified with antiSMASH [29] v5.1.2. All bioinformatics tools used for genome assembly and analyses were operated with default parameters or as specified in the text.

The complete genome of P. fragi A13BB comprises a single chromosome 4,940,458 bp in size with a GC content of 59.40%. Genomic features include 4410 CDSs, 25 rRNA, 73 tRNA, 4 ncRNA, 3 CRISPRs, 3 prophage regions and 37 predicted genomic islands (data file 8) [30]. Also, 353 subsystems comprising of various gene clusters including those associated with bioremediation, environmental adaptation, biocontrol, and plant growth promotion were identified (data file 9) [31]. Two β-lactone smBGCs, both showing low homology (20%) to known smBGCs, were identified. β-lactones are known for their antibiotic, anticancer and antiobesity properties [32]. A siderophore smBGC was identified even though P. fragi is considered a non-siderophore producing member of the genus Pseudomonas [33]. Arylpolyene and NAGGN smBGCs were also identified which, along with the siderophore smBGC, are likely to contribute to the environmental fitness of the strain [34,35,36]. Table 1 provides the links to data files 1–9.

Table 1 Overview of data files/data sets

We believe the dataset presented in Pseudomonas fragi strain A13BB chromosome, complete genome [39] and in this data note form a sound basis for further in-depth study of the metabolic and biosynthetic capabilities of this strain, and indeed of other closely related species. The dataset also provides useful insights into the molecular mechanisms that underpin these capabilities. Furthermore, being only the fourth publicly available complete genome sequence of P. fragi, the data will enrich the comparative genomics study of the species.

Limitations

IslandViewer 4 was run with default parameters. Crucially, IslandPick was run with default comparison genomes; different comparison genomes at different phyletic distances may influence the output of the analysis i.e. number of predicted genomic islands.

Availability of data and materials

Data files 1–9 described in this Data note can be freely and openly accessed on Figshare (https://figshare.com/) [7, 11, 13, 14, 17, 19, 21, 30, 31]. Datasets 1 and 2 can be freely and openly accessed on the NCBI database. Illumina and GridION reads generated have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRP251948 (Dataset 1) [37]. The genome assembly of P. fragi A13BB has been deposited in GenBank under accession number GCA_015767515.1 (Dataset 2) [38]. The BioProject accession number for the entire project is PRJNA610978. Please see Table 1 and references for details and links to the data.

Abbreviations

GC:

Guanine-Cytosine

CDSs:

Coding sequences

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

rRNA:

Ribosomal ribonucleic acid

tRNA:

Transfer ribonucleic acid

ncRNA:

Non-coding ribonucleic acid

CRISPRs:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

PGPR:

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

smBGCs:

Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

gDNA:

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

ONT:

Oxford nanopore technology

ANI:

Average nucleotide identity

NAGGN:

N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide

References

  1. 1.

    Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Moënne-Loccoz Y. The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil. 2009;321(1-2):341–61. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63(1):541–56. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bérdy J. Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and where we are heading. J Antibiot. 2012;65(8):385–95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/ja.2012.27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ercolini D, Casaburi A, Nasi A, Ferrocino I, Monaco RD, Ferranti P, et al. Different molecular types of Pseudomonas fragi have the same overall behaviour as meat spoilers. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;142(1-2):120–31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Selvakumar G, Joshi P, Nazim S, Mishra P, Bisht J, Gupta H. Phosphate solubilization and growth promotion by Pseudomonas fragi CS11RH1 (MTCC 8984), a psychrotolerant bacterium isolated from a high altitude Himalayan rhizosphere. Biologia. 2009;64(2):239–45. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2478/s11756-009-0041-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Farh ME, Kim YJ, Sukweenadhi J, Singh P, Yang DC. Aluminium resistant, plant growth promoting bacteria induce overexpression of aluminium stress related genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and increase the ginseng tolerance against aluminium stress. Microbiol Res. 2017;200:45–52. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.micres.2017.04.004.

  7. 7.

    Data File 1: Composition of ultra-minimal substrate growth medium. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.12781193.v1 (2020).

  8. 8.

    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Data file 2: Quality distribution of Illumina reads. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.13490967.v1 (2020).

  12. 12.

    De Coster W, D'Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(15):2666–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Data file 3: Basic quality statistics of GridION sequencing data. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.13491147.v1 (2020).

  14. 14.

    Data File 4: Average GridION read quality plot. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.13491210.v1 (2020).

  15. 15.

    Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):1–22. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Data file 5: Quast report. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.13491228.v1 (2020).

  18. 18.

    Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(19):3210–2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Data file 6: Short BUSCO summary. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.13491234.v1 (2020).

  20. 20.

    Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(20):3350–2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Data file 7: Assembly graph. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.14370608.v1 (2021).

  22. 22.

    Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5114. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(14):6614–24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkw569.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):8365. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/srep08365.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/28.1.27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J, Néron B, et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W246–51. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gky425.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Simon Fraser University Research Computing Group, Lau BY, et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W30–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkx343.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W16–21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkw387.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, Lee SY, et al. AntiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W81–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkz310.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Data file 8: Predicted Genomic Islands of P. fragi A13BB. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.13491300.v1 (2020).

  31. 31.

    Data file 9: Metabolic pathways of interest in P. fragi A13BB and associated gene clusters. Figshare. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.6084/m9.figshare.13507971.v1 (2020).

  32. 32.

    Robinson SL, Christenson JK, Wackett LP. Biosynthesis and chemical diversity of β-lactone natural products. Nat Prod Rep. 2019;36(3):458–75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1039/c8np00052b.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Champomier-Vergès MC, Stintzi A, Meyer JM. Acquisition of iron by the non-siderophore-producing Pseudomonas fragi. Microbiology. 1996;142(5):1191–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1099/13500872-142-5-1191.

  34. 34.

    Schöner TA, Gassel S, Osawa A, Tobias NJ, Okuno Y, Sakakibara Y, et al. Aryl Polyenes, a highly abundant class of bacterial natural products, are functionally related to Antioxidative carotenoids. Chembiochem. 2016;17(3):247–53. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/cbic.201500474.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sagot B, Gaysinski M, Mehiri M, Guigonis JM, Le Rudulier D, et al. Osmotically induced synthesis of the dipeptide N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide is mediated by a new pathway conserved among bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(28):12652–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1073/pnas.1003063107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Saha M, Sarkar S, Sarkar B, Sharma BK, Bhattacharjee S, Tribedi P. Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(5):3984–99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11356-015-4294-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    National Center for Biotechnology Information. Sequence Read Archive. https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRP251948 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    National Center for Biotechnology Information. Assembly. https://identifiers.org/insdc.gca:GCA_015767515.1 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Awolope OK, Di Salvo A, O’Driscoll NH, Lamb AJ. Pseudomonas fragi strain A13BB chromosome, complete genome. GenBank. https://identifiers.org/insdc:CP065202. 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Illumina sequencing was performed by Glasgow Polyomics (http://www.glasgow.ac.uk/polyomics), GridION sequencing was provided by MicrobesNG (http://www.microbesng.uk). The authors would like to thank Dr. David McGuinness (Glasgow Polyomics) for the invaluable assistance with Illumina data analysis.

Funding

The project was supported by Tenovus Scotland (grant number G16.04). Tenovus Scotland played no role in the design of the study or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The project was conceived and designed by OKA and AJL. Data acquisition was performed by OKA. Data analysis and interpretation was performed by OKA, NHO, ADS and AJL. The project was jointly supervised by NHO, ADS and AJL. AJL was the principal investigator. The manuscript was written by OKA and revised by NHO, ADS and AJL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Lamb.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Soil sampling was undertaken on private land in Aberdeen, Scotland, UK with full landowner permission.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Awolope, O.K., O’Driscoll, N.H., Di Salvo, A. et al. De novo genome assembly and analysis unveil biosynthetic and metabolic potentials of Pseudomonas fragi A13BB. BMC Genom Data 22, 15 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12863-021-00969-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pseudomonas fragi
  • β-Lactone antibiotics
  • Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
  • Rhizosphere microbiome