Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals novel insights into transcriptional responses to phosphorus starvation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) root

Table 1 DEGs that co-expressed at both 14d and 28d (− 1 < log₂ fold change > 1; q-value < 0.05)

DEG accession no.	T1 vs C1		T2 vs C2		Annotation	Arabidopsis homologue accession no.
DEG accession no.	Log₂ FC	q-value	Log₂ FC	q-value	Annotation	Arabidopsis homologue accession no.
105,041,362	2.644	3.71e-3	2.475	1.25e-3	Uncharacterized protein	OAO90986
105,038,152	2.389	6.13e-3	2.209	2.08e-2	Aquaporin NIP6–1-like protein	NP_178191
105,044,363	2.335	1.01e-2	1.999	6.90e-3	Transcription factor PCL1-like	NP_001030823
105,053,650	2.020	2.14e-2	2.441	2.21e-2	Photosystem I reaction center subunit IV	NP_179616
105,051,924	−2.663	1.01e-2	−1.941	1.97e-2	Chlorophyllide a oxygenase	NP_175088
105,041,596	−8.990	3.12e-2	−2.785	1.86e-3	14–3-3-like protein GF14 omega	AAA96253
105,037,590	−10.442	2.27e-2	−2.988	3.36e-7	14–3-3-like protein 16R	NP_565176

T1 denotes -P group at 14d, C1 denotes +P group at 14d, T1 vs C1 denotes -P/+P comparison at 14d, T2 denotes -P group at 28d, C2 denotes +P group at 28d, T2 vs C2 denotes -P/+P comparison at 28d. FC denotes fold change

ISSN: 2730-6844